Defining project-based POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS requires building bridges between scientific evidence and public policy, thus highlighting the utility of scientific findings for results-based policy making. Translating the fruit of research efforts into policy is about achieving impact in the public interest, as uni-dimensional, linear models that aim to link research to action tend to ignore multidimensional synergies that are crucial to driving and sustaining innovative, impactful public policy initiatives that can deliver lasting results for citizens and communities.

All projects of the Horizon 2020 DRS01 Cluster are committed to contributing policy recommendations to increase the impact of their resilience-focused EU science initiatives on the resilience of individuals and communities.

DRS01 Cluster

A tailored Workshop on POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS was offered to the DRS01 Cluster project teams at the Crises Managers Innovation Network CMINE to provide support in this shared challenge. The Workshop was lead by international expert Adam Knelman Ostry  who helps governments & int institutions define and implement strategic policy frameworks & recommendations across the globe. 

A facilitated joint brainstorming session focused on how best to embrace the challenge of defining policy recommendations in the specific context of our projects and engaged all invited project teams in focused dialogue.

The challenges identified by the DRS01 Cluster project teams included among others:

  • Developing a clear strategy for key recommendations and outputs, engaging co-creation partners and target audiences
  • Mainstreaming the recommendations to align with focus on risk awareness, social capital and preparedness for resilience
  • Defining transformative recommendations, effectively bridging local, national and global policies through research generated, evidence-based input
  • Supporting formal integration of technological innovations and related optimization measures into disaster risk reduction plans
  • Formulating robust conclusions and recommendations focused on social capital in DRR
  • Applying an iterative process of refining the findings and recommendations thereof.

The guidance shared during the workshop focused on a checklist of “building blocks” aimed at supporting the design and delivery of impactful policy recommendation that can deliver results for citizens and communities. These include key aspects of:

Problem identification

What exactly is the problem? For whom is it a problem? Is there a gap in public policy that has allowed the issue to arise? A specific market failure to be addressed? Is it a government’s job to address it?

Identifying all key potential stakeholders and building a consensus across all stakeholder groups on the essence of the “what” and the “why” of the policy challenge is a sine qua non baseline condition for designing and implementing policy action.

Basic building blocks include forging across all relevant stakeholder groups a common, consensus-based understanding of the concepts and vocabulary used to define the issues along with the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder group that will be involved in developing a way forward. Are governments and the research community all speaking a common language?

Data gathering

Data needs to be gathered and independently validated; data and information then need to be translated into policy useful evidence.

Integration of lessons learned

Policy-useful evidence evokes prior experience – has this kind of issue surfaced before? What was done about it at the time? What worked, what did not, and why? How is this information being integrated into the policy development process now?

Strategic plan design

Clear, integrated multidimensional objectives are defined to strengthen the impact of a policy response through coherent, sequenced and prioritized implementation. Ex-Ante Regulatory impact assessment is used in support of the design and implementation of the strategy – will it work in practice? For whom – does it pursue the public interest effectively? Is it cost-effective? Does it achieve value for money?

Use of strategic foresight and horizon scanning can integrate emerging issues into strategic planning to address the current challenges at hand and can be used to prevent the adoption of short-term policy initiatives that, as they seek to address immediate political imperatives, can end up compromising medium and longer term efforts to achieve sustainability.

Identification of resources

Both human and financial – this requires flexible workforce planning and management practices, along with the effective assignment of financial resources to the tasks at hand.  

Governance: institutional arrangements to engage stakeholders and citizens

Building (or harnessing existing) institutional and functional capacity to engage stakeholders within and outside government at all points in the policy-making cycle, bearing in mind the relationship between the local and national levels of government. Recommendation design needs to encompass multilevel governance and reflect on systems of engagement at all points along the policy-making cycle.

Testing the plans and recommendations

Is there buy-in from all relevant stakeholder groups and citizens?

Monitoring

Are all elements of the strategic plan being implemented on time and on budget?

Evaluation  

Is the strategic plan achieving the strategic outcomes for citizens and communities that it was designed to achieve? If not, can performance evidence be used to adjust course? Are there effective feedback loops in place to ensure constant improvement in strategy design and delivery based on performance evidence?

Workshop conclusion

The research community needs to be able to speak to government in a language that integrates the vocabulary of public policy-making. The power of misunderstanding vs a common, consensus-based understanding of problems, concepts and policy approaches and roles across all stakeholder groups in the research community and within local and national governments.

Open government principles should be deployed in support of engaging citizens and non-governmental organizations, engaged from the start of the policy making cycle across all of its stages.

Categories: Events

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published.

Risk

Here there will be a high-level text in which we explain that there are little to no risks associated with RESILOC research activities, nevertheless, here is a list with identified risks and inconveniences for specific activities 
Name of the research activity 1 (here there will be a pop up for each research activity. We will provide the text). 
Name of the research activity 2 
Name of the research activity 3 
Name of the research activity n 

Associated Risks - RA1

Catania- Workshops on Dimensions, Indicators and Proxies


There are no foreseen physical, mental or reputational risks related to participation in this workshop.

Your participation will be treated in confidence. RESILOC may use quotes from the Q&A in publications but these will be anonymised and any personal information that could be used to identify you will be removed.

This will close in 0 seconds

Associated Risks - RA2

Catania – Validation Workshops


There are no foreseen physical, mental or reputational risks related to participation in this workshop.

Your participation will be treated in confidence. RESILOC may use quotes from the Q&A in publications but these will be anonymised and any personal information that could be used to identify you will be removed.

This will close in 0 seconds

RA 1 - Selection of participants

Catania- Workshops on Dimensions, Indicators and Proxies


Participation in the Catania Workshop on Dimensions, Indicators and Proxies is voluntary but restricted to members of the Community of Catania assigned to the RESILOC Project.

This will close in 0 seconds

RA 2 - Selection of participants

Catania – Validation Workshops


Participation in the Catania Validation Workshop is voluntary but restricted to members of the Community of Catania assigned to the RESILOC Project.

This will close in 0 seconds

RA 2 - General

Catania – Validation Workshops


The goal of the research activity is to collect and evaluate the results of the three workshops of phase one. This will be carried out through a questionnaire (Validation tool 1.1) that is organised in two parts (10 questions in total).

The first section evaluates the relevance/applicability of DIP (dimensions, indicators and  proxies) in the context of Catania.

The second section collects feedback on the role of scenarios as a tool for testing the validity of the DIP system and collects information on the clarity and understanding of the data gathering process. You are asked to receive and complete the questionnaire submitted by the Local Training Lead, returning it back by email before and no later than Monday 07/02/2022.

The RESILOC research team will use the answers you provide to further refine the development of the resilience tool that aims to improve the resilience of local communities.

This will close in 0 seconds

RA1 - Overview Catania

Catania - Workshops on Dimensions, Indicators and Proxies


The workshop will be a mixed meeting, with both in-person and remote participants, and led by the Local Training Lead. The Local Training Lead will introduce the participants to the theoretical framework developed.

This activity will be performed via a PowerPoint presentation that aims to explain the scientific/research framework of RESILOC, introducing the DIP database and the logic behind it. During the presentation, the Local Training Lead will explore participants views, in particular on the approach of using dimensions, indicators and proxies to capture the resilience of a community; this will be done through dedicated Q&A sessions during specific moments of the workshop.

The purpose is to make the representatives of the Municipality and the LRT members able to evaluate the applicability of the framework in terms of relevance, feasibility, data availability, among others for the community of Catania.

This will close in 0 seconds

RA1 - Privacy, confidentiality and personal data handling

Catania- Workshops on Dimensions, Indicators and Proxies


For this particular research activity, we collect the following personal data in order to have a better understanding of your opinion and perspective.:

  • name
  • organisation
  • community name
  • email
  • phone number (optional)

We would also like to make a video recording of the workshop (optional), which will only be used to aid us to improve the analysis of the answers you provide.

This will close in 0 seconds

RA 2 - Privacy, confidentiality and personal data handling

Catania – Validation Workshops


For this particular research activity, we collect the following personal data in order to have a better understanding of your opinion and perspective:

  • name
  • organisation
  • community name
  • email
  • phone number (optional)

We would also like to make a video recording of the workshop (optional), which will only be used to aid us to improve the analysis of the answers you provide.

The data collected will be stored on the IES server, protected by data security protocols, for a maximum of 2 years (up to one year after the end of the project).

This will close in 0 seconds